@Innerworld@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoWikipedia Blacklists Archive.today, Starts Removing 695,000 Archive Linksarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down11cross-posted to: newstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1212arrow-down1external-linkWikipedia Blacklists Archive.today, Starts Removing 695,000 Archive Linksarstechnica.com@Innerworld@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square33fedilinkcross-posted to: newstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞linkfedilinkEnglish21•2 months agoDammit. Everyone’s been using that site to get around paywalls because it works well. Now I have to go find another one that works as well. :|
minus-square@betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink24•2 months agoThere are others that don’t DDoS blogs.
minus-square🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoWell, yes, I’ll be off looking for them next time I need to use an archival site. I’m bummed to learn this crap about archive.ph.
minus-square@dan@upvote.aulinkfedilink13•edit-22 months agoIt works well because they use paid accounts to scrape a bunch of paywalled sites, which is why publishers are trying to figure out who runs it. It’s completely untrustworthy now that they’ve shown that they can (and do) edit archived pages.
Dammit. Everyone’s been using that site to get around paywalls because it works well. Now I have to go find another one that works as well. :|
There are others that don’t DDoS blogs.
Well, yes, I’ll be off looking for them next time I need to use an archival site. I’m bummed to learn this crap about archive.ph.
It works well because they use paid accounts to scrape a bunch of paywalled sites, which is why publishers are trying to figure out who runs it.
It’s completely untrustworthy now that they’ve shown that they can (and do) edit archived pages.