Karna to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-25 days agoWayland Found To Be "Intrinsically Faster Than X11, But Not Necessarily More Efficient"www.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down113cross-posted to: newslinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-linkWayland Found To Be "Intrinsically Faster Than X11, But Not Necessarily More Efficient"www.phoronix.comKarna to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-25 days agomessage-square24fedilinkcross-posted to: newslinux@lemmy.world
minus-square1984linkfedilink9•edit-25 days agoIt’s better. Much better. If Linux desktops was still on X, it would feel and be incredibly dated. I know it works “fine” but has many limitations, which is why we needed Wayland in the first place.
minus-square@ILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilink2•3 days agoThere has been a lot of reintroduce X issue because we discovered why they did it. But I don’t think there’s an argument to not use Wayland if you’re able to.
It’s better. Much better. If Linux desktops was still on X, it would feel and be incredibly dated. I know it works “fine” but has many limitations, which is why we needed Wayland in the first place.
There has been a lot of reintroduce X issue because we discovered why they did it.
But I don’t think there’s an argument to not use Wayland if you’re able to.