• tinsukE
    link
    fedilink
    1011 hours ago

    Alright, what are the alternatives folks?

    Gentoo? Gentoo!

    (But I’ll keep watch to see of they don’t revert course because “the models are now too powerful”, since it is a policy from 2024)

    The policy

    Gentoo Council has voted on 2024-04-14 on the following policy:

    It is expressly forbidden to contribute to Gentoo any content that has been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence tools. This motion can be revisited, should a case be made for such a tool that does not pose copyright, ethical and quality concerns.

    This policy affects Gentoo contributions and the official Gentoo projects. It does not prohibit adding packages for AI-related software or software that is being developed with the help of such tools upstream.

    https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/AI_policy

    • @amd@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 hour ago

      I genuinely wonder how they’re going to square this policy with LLM code in the kernel.

      Personally, I’m guessing that all distros will eventually bend and allow LLM code.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        When an LLM agent reports a huge security bug and provides the solution and the only solution is explicitly exactly what it wrote.

        Checkmate!

      • tinsukE
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago

        I think this bit makes it clear that shipping LLM code from the kernel that wasn’t contributed by Gentoo is fine:

        This policy affects Gentoo contributions and the official Gentoo projects. It does not prohibit adding packages for AI-related software or software that is being developed with the help of such tools upstream.