So if GNOME does something everyone else is not doing, they’re “fucking up”, but if they follow what someone else has done that you like, they’re just creating a “cheap copy”? How do they win?
Either way, the end result is slow, the UI is basic… and the transition between the host and VMs fails half the time or performs bad like cursor going not where it is supposed to go.
What are they trying to fuck up down on their quest for the “perfect vision”?
Im not a big fan of gnome, but this system monitor update is pretty legit
Looks like a cheap copy of MissionCenter… https://flathub.org/apps/io.missioncenter.MissionCenter
So if GNOME does something everyone else is not doing, they’re “fucking up”, but if they follow what someone else has done that you like, they’re just creating a “cheap copy”? How do they win?
And Boxes looked like a cheap copy of Virtualbox. But now it’s my daily driver because how good it is
Boxes is so… damn… unbearably… slow. Subpar virtualization.
Boxes does not do the virtualization
Either way, the end result is slow, the UI is basic… and the transition between the host and VMs fails half the time or performs bad like cursor going not where it is supposed to go.