Which one(s) and why?

  • @Haven5341@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    85
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Which one(s)

    Arch.

    why?

    1. The Arch-Wiki
    2. I like pacman
    3. The Arch-Wiki
    4. I wanted a rolling-release distribution.
    5. The Arch-Wiki
    6. It just works. I had only one more serious problem in ~8 years of running Arch
    7. Did I mention the Arch-Wiki?

    Edit:

    Having said that, I have an eye on immutable distros. Maybe one day I’ll try one out.

    • @sarchar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      199 months ago

      The Arch wiki really is amazing. It’s also still very useful for Linux stuff in general. The qemu page has come in handy more than a dozen times.

      • SmokeInFog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I use Mint and the Arch wiki is still one of my first stops when I have an issue

    • @SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      Is Manjaro good if I want in on this Arch goodness but don’t want to spend hours configuring stuff? Coming from Fedora

      • @Haven5341@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        I haven’t used Manjaro myself but I heard that it is not as good as Arch. Rumors I heard where that it is not as solid as vanilla Arch. YMMV.

      • neo (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        If you plan to use the AUR, absolutely not.

        If you don’t plan to use the AUR it’s probably fine, but I haven’t used it personally in the last few years so I’m not sure.

      • @nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        I really have bad luck with Manjaro, even when I don’t use the aur it always breaks on me. I just stick to arch, I started with it and I’m sticking with it.

      • million
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I haven’t used it personally but I’ve seen a lot of folks bad mouthing Manjaro.

        Lots of complaints of instability and it being poorly run project. One of the more objective complaints I’ve read is they have a slower release process so security fixes take longer then Arch.

      • chepycou 🇻🇦
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        @SubArcticTundra @Haven5341 I personally think Manjaro is a false good idea.

        You’ll have an “out of date” system (i.e., one-month-old) but packages from the AUR which are made for the up-to-date system.

        Quite a nightmare to use IMO (and that’s not talking about Manjaro leadership and certificates problems)

      • @alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        I’ve been running it on my work laptop for 6 years at this point and I’ve had no major issues I couldn’t solve.

        Having said that, I recently switched my gaming rig over to endeavour and it’s been great.

      • Luella
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I’ve been using manjaro for around a year. It broke on me once, probably my fault, idk. I enjoy it! I’ve distro hopped many places and a year is a long time for me, so much about it is right for me. You’ll certainly get a worthy experience of what arch is capable of, I believe.

        That being said, I plan on swapping to arch really soon.

      • RachelRodent
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        No. Manjaro is more likely to break than arch because they hold of updating their pakages. What you are looking for is EndavourOS. I consider it to be “the new manjaro”

      • @Nyanix@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I’ve been daily driving Manjaro for 4 years without any issues. Generally speaking I’d recommend seeing if there is a flatpak for an app before using AUR. I don’t update as soon as updates are out though, so usually any issues there may have been have been shmoothed over before I get to it.