• Illecors
    link
    fedilink
    English
    649 days ago

    IPv6. My stupid ISP actually shipped their router with all inbound ipv6 blocked with no way to unblock it, so I set up opnsense. Works like a charm!

    • walden
      link
      fedilink
      English
      369 days ago

      At least your stupid ISP has IPv6. Mine doesn’t (yet).

      • Illecors
        link
        fedilink
        English
        139 days ago

        Fair enough, I guess. Still, I was dumbstruck by lack of ability to open up a port.

          • Illecors
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 days ago

            Glad to hear! Not that you’d want to send email from a residential IP anyway - if not for your ISP, every email service wouls bounce it anyway.

    • FundMECFSOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      239 days ago

      I’m very uneducated about this stuff. How does IPV6 fix that issue?

      • Illecors
        link
        fedilink
        English
        399 days ago

        It doesn’t fix it, per se, rather removes the need for layers of hacks such as nat and cg-nat. Every device gets a globally routable IP - no need to forward anything, just open the port you want.

        • osaerisxero
          link
          fedilink
          239 days ago

          This doesn’t solve for VPNs no longer offering it though, unless the VPN services started offering pure v6 via tunnel at some point while I wasn’t looking. I know I’ve never seen a v6 pier in the last few years since I started sailing again.

          • FundMECFSOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            89 days ago

            Yeah thats been my issue. It works fine on my unprotected IP. But I don’t have the cash to spend on expensive vpns and the cheap options seem to universally be shlt for port forwarding, ie. seeding

              • adr1an
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 days ago

                No idea but torrentfreak always posted a “best vpn of year xyz”. I’d go with that one. (Or check if mullvad has any tutorial on the subject.)

    • @elidoz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 days ago

      opnsense sounds like what I was looking for (if I understand correctly)

      I had no idea there was a way to go around the ipv6 restrictions

      • Illecors
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 days ago

        It’s not v6 itself, it’s rather lack of layers of nat that prevent forwarding a v4 for most folks.

          • azuth
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Port forwarding is necessary due to NAT not firewalls.

            It’s not that your router blocks new incoming connections at port X, it’s that it does not know which local client it’s meant for, since it’s addressed to the public IP that is held by your router.

            With IP6 it’s lan client also gets assigned a public IP6 address (as there are plenty) and so the router receives a connection addressed to a Lan client and knows where to route it.

            • JustEnoughDucks
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 days ago

              But how does this change using VPNs with torrenting? Especially because it seems like the vast majority don’t support ipv6 as well as openvpn often leaking ipv6 IPs.

              • azuth
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 days ago

                Not sure since I don’t use a VPN. If they assigned a unique public IP per user they could just forward every incoming connection to the user’s PC.

                If they don’t they need to setup some port forwarding rules.

                If openVPN leaks IPs that’s surely a bug, if it’s specific to v6 you can’t use openVPN and IPv6 till the bug is fixed

          • Illecors
            link
            fedilink
            English
            09 days ago

            Normally firewall is on the router. Sensitive environments usually run one on the client as well.

  • Rogue Satellite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    469 days ago

    As someone who has recently started seeding as much as I can, this is a great question to which I don’t have the answer.

    I am not renewing my Proton yearly subscription after it ends due to recent developments. They seem to be the only “big name” VPN with the port forwarding feature. I heard of OpenVPN, but have not had a chance to dig into it too much.

    My ISP does not provide IPV6 support, so this will be pretty important to sort out soon.

    • Davel23
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      309 days ago

      OpenVPN is client/server software for setting up a VPN on your own infrastructure. It’s not a third-party service like ProtonVPN.

      • @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        169 days ago

        Aren’t they located in Italy, the Shithole that keeps trying to outlaw all VPNs and/or force them to provide backdoors and identifiable customers? They can only be stopped so many times before they succeed…

        • @Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          139 days ago

          Yeah it’s a bit of a “for now” thing and worth keeping an eye on Italy. To their credit, they don’t offer services in Italy itself anymore after the “privacy shield” bullshit because “it goes against their mission” (for what that’s worth lol)

          Afaik, there’s not many other choices for port forwarding

    • @bigDottee@geekroom.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      109 days ago

      I seem to be out of the loop in regards to proton controversy and I haven’t found anything outstanding against them…

      Can you help me understand what you’re specifically referring to? I’m a proton user… so kinda want to know lol

      • FundMECFSOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 days ago

        as far as I can tell their CEO is a semi alt right cunt. Apart from that everythin seems pretty okay and the recent shift to nonprofit status is cool

        • Night Monkey
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -329 days ago

          😂 does everything have to be political now? I don’t care if the dude is a space alien who birthed Hitler, if the service is solid, I’m using it.

          • @Danitos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            379 days ago

            It has always been. FOSS is by itself political, just beyond the basic binary logic of left/right.

            Your apoliticism is a political instance as well. Take for instance this quoute from Desmond Tutu “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

            I’m not saying you have to ditch Proton over their CEO’s takes, my point is that thinking that everything suddenly became political is naive.

              • @Danitos@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Agree, but that’s reality. People suck, world sucks, life sucks.

                You don’t have to change your lifestyle over whatever thing that decided to say today. It is not wrong to feel that way neither. But, IMO, being aware of that, or at least being open to learn about that stuff, helps a lot to being in peace with it, and eventually, could lead to a more ethical consumption without going to extremes.

          • Luke
            link
            fedilink
            English
            259 days ago

            Everything has always been political. Just because you’re too privileged to notice that until someone mentions a viewpoint you dislike doesn’t mean anything except that you’re usually oblivious.

              • @LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                69 days ago

                You may as well tell blue skies and green grass to suck it. It exists and dictates your world whether you want it to or not.

                • @Shadowfax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  39 days ago

                  That is ignoring the fact that the sky and grass are objective realities. “Politics” is all subjective. These are not the same thing, and your comparison is disingenuous and cynical.

                  True, you cannot avoid politics if you interact with others, hell, the family itself is the very first political unit. However, politics in the sense of news and elections is not the same, and is entirely avoidable. Your friends and families will tell you the important things anyway… it reminds me of the old blog post about avoiding the news, by Aaron Schwartz, well worth a read http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/hatethenews

      • @Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -129 days ago

        CEO is a libertarian idiot who can’t see any difference between American Republicans and Democrats. CEO doesn’t have absolute control of proton, that’s a board of other privacy advocates. Proton as a service provider is still safe despite their CEO being a political twit.

        IMO: A libertarian who doesn’t understand any value in why a government could possibly be good is the kind of person I want running an encryption service company. Wouldn’t trust him for running anything else though.

        Devils advocate: Both parties love the alphabet agencies unconditionally and historically saw no problem with them. Still waiting for the Snowden wrist slap to happen. He is a bigger idiot for not letting public relations for the company handle his opinion.

        • @mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 days ago

          Proton as a service provider is still safe despite their CEO being a political twit.

          That twit was allowed to use the company’s Mastodon account to double-down on his shitty political post

          • @Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 days ago

            Yeah, I’ll wait for him to start telling Engineers that the encryption infrastructure has to be done his way. And telling the proton board that the engineers are all liars.

    • @IronKrill@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’ve been happily using Windscribe for a while now, they have port forwarding with a dedicated IP. Averaging out the separate charges, it’s about $4 USD/month for a custom plan (1 location + unlimited data) + dedicated IP. Technically their Pro tier includes ephemeral port forwarding, but I don’t like how it works.

    • JayGray91
      link
      fedilink
      69 days ago

      I use Private Internet Access (PIA) and that has port forwarding. I read something about it on reddit but forgot about it, so idk of there’s anything bad it controversial surrounding PIA.

      • Kernal64
        link
        fedilink
        English
        199 days ago

        They got bought by a malvertising company a few years ago. It’s what made me drop them after being a customer of theirs for years.

      • @Ilandar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 days ago

        There is, just not in relation to piracy. The concerns are more over its financial incentives/ownership and privacy.

    • @oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 days ago

      If you have a bit extra money, get a seedbox. Cheapest I’ve seen is €10/mo

    • @linuxguy@lemmy.gregw.us
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 days ago

      Torguard looks very BT friendly but I’ve still got mullvad subscription left and haven’t tried them. That and the branding / website just seem illegitimate though I’ve not found any legit criticisms.

  • @tVxUHF@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    319 days ago

    We just need to add I2P directly into the client in a way that’s transparent to the user and all the problems are solved.

    • FundMECFSOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 days ago

      How does the I2P architecture solve the port forwarding issue. Is peer discovery easier within I2P?

      • @ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I2P has a mechanism where if you can’t open a port, another I2P router can help with NAT hole punching so that you can establish a connection.

        In practice this means I2P users can be equally well connected regardless of being able to open a port.

        But, unfortunately I2P is very slow. But maybe it’s just because there’s few people running routers, on slow networks?
        In any case, it would be beneficial to have it easily accessible to everyone, so that copyright holders can go pound sand.

        Edit: When you couldn’t open ports for I2P, the I2P router will have the “Network: Firewalled” status. This is the description of this status on the router dashboard:

        Firewalled: Your UDP port appears to be firewalled. As the firewall detection methods are not 100% reliable, this may occasionally be displayed in error. However, if it appears consistently, you should check whether both your external and internal firewalls are open for your port. I2P will work fine when firewalled, there is no reason for concern. When firewalled, the router uses “introducers” to relay inbound connections. However, you will get more participating traffic and help the network if you open your firewall. If you think you have already done so, remember that you may have both a hardware and a software firewall, or be behind an additional, institutional firewall you cannot control. Also, some routers cannot correctly forward both TCP and UDP on a single port, or may have other limitations or bugs that prevent them from passing traffic through to I2P.

    • @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 days ago

      If I could have an all in one browser like Tor or have jackett do postman too I’d be set, except for the whole “works better the longer you leave it running” thing is only true until my battery dies.

    • Kane
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 days ago

      There are providers that do not provide you your own IPv4 address, with a feature called “CGNAT”. Often, they will then block you from port-forwarding altogether.

    • @tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      77 days ago

      Bc $$$.

      My provider won’t allow it unless I pay them $15/mo extra.

      You can change the setting on your router anytime but it won’t work if your ISP doesn’t actually allow it.

  • @Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    379 days ago

    Bulgaria, Hong Kong, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Netherlands, Russia, Cyprus, Moldova, Romania, Ukraine, Singapore, and Sweden. They all spit in the eye of DMCA.

    VPS in any of these countries, or just find a provider that doesn’t care about torrenting. If you go the VPS option, run your own VPN and just look for a VPS that allows considerable traffic. A quick example, Ultahost (Netherlands) offers a VPS with unlimited bandwidth for $7/mo if you pay for 3 years in advance. Like sure, now you’re paying to torrent, but I would rather pay $7/mo to protect myself with a VPN that I control vs worrying about port forwarding and getting DMCA’s in the mail. 🤷‍♂️ I guess it depends on how much skin you want in the game.

    • @ntn888@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 days ago

      That’s exactly what I did. Better yet I routed it though a wireguard tunnel! I documented the process here.

    • @Sam@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 days ago

      Do you have a source about the Netherlands? I thought this had changed in 2014

      • @gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 days ago

        Localhost NAS with large storage, Rclone to seedbox, synch, remove old content from seedbox

        Source: I have 8TB rn and about to add more, this is how I use my seedbox and store shit

        • @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Only seeding new stuff that everyone else is also seeding is not good for torrenting in general, it will kill a lot of content that’s more than a few years old and/or not completely mainstream.

          • @N0x0n@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 days ago

            Yeah most seedboxers are just the new leechers of this generation… Keeping up their ratio about an unreasonable amount where they can leech everything they want without the need to give back…

            They just stay for the necessary amount of time specified by their private tracker and leave the queue afterwards.

            IMO seedboxes should have another rule associated to them… Straight to 1 month seeding time or get a hit&run warning !

            • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 days ago

              I wouldn’t call them leechers since they are seeding back to build said ratio. I think it’d be more accurate to call them a single component of a larger ‘structure’ including people like myself who permaseed from home on a slower connection. If it were all people like me, we’d all be waiting days for new releases to fully download and if it were all seedboxes, we would have zero seeders for anything older than a month or two. Many private trackers incentivize long-term seeding to help control this imbalance, and I think it works well in my experience.

    • calm.like.a.bomb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      249 days ago

      That’s for downloading, but it you want to upload/seed, then you would need port forwarding.

        • sunzu2
          link
          fedilink
          38 days ago

          correct… you aint power seeding but enough to to give back to the community of Linux iso enoyers

      • Mr. WorldWide
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 days ago

        yes, seeding works too, with no port forwarding. With mullvad, it just works and with proton I have to enable “moderate NAT” sometimes, but seeding works without port forwarding, it always has

        • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          Only because you’re seeding to people that have port forwarding active. You can’t seed to people that are running the same setup as yourself.

          • Mr. WorldWide
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -28 days ago

            Port forwarding is a huge vulnerability. With proton it’s not as much of a vulnerability, but it still opens a lot of shit that should stay closed

            whatever the case is, I’m able to seed without port forwarding

            • @CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              48 days ago

              You’re opening a port in your VPN connection so no there’s no “huge vulnerability” (even without a VPN you’re only opening a port to your torrent client) and as mentioned, you’re only seeding to people who have port forwarding set up. If more people run without it like yourself, the whole system breaks down.

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 days ago

      When you are not port forwarding you can only download from users who are actually port forwarding, or am I incorrect?

      • @kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 days ago

        I2P is IMO the future for torrenting. The only downside it still has is that their is less content. But that will be solved when more and more people migrate to I2P

        • FundMECFSOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 days ago

          Does that mean you would route your BitTorrent traffic through I2P?

          Doesn’t that severely limit peer discovery to only other I2P users, since AFAIK I2P has no exit nodes / clearweb access?

          • @kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 days ago

            Yes that is true. Their are a few bittorrent clients that can cross seed however. But it mainly stays inside i2P which Is good and makes it fully anonymous

    • @HouseWolf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 days ago

      Can someone correct me here.

      If I have i2P enabled on my qBittorent client and I start seeding a torrent downloaded from a non-i2P connection.

      Does my seed of it allow others to download that torrent through i2P?

  • @ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 days ago

    You have to separate pirating and torrenting. I’m pirating stuff non stop each day. I’m torrenting maybe once a month, if that. It’s just not the go to thing for a lot of users, so issues around VPNs and torrenting probably aren’t that pressing to warrant any kind of reaction.

    • Higgs boson
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 days ago

      Yuup. Torrents are for the rare thing I care about that isnt on either nzbgeek or matrix.

          • @oldfart@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 days ago

            Looking it up and the ut’s all news like this:

            NZBMatrix, a popular Usenet indexer, closed in 2012 due to a large takedown notice from Hollywood studios

  • @Wrrzag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 days ago

    I’ve never had a problem with it in Spain. What is different where you live? CGNAT?

    • Jack Sparrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      μTP (Micro Transport Protocol) has “support for NAT traversal using UDP hole punching between two port-restricted peers where a third unrestricted peer acts as a STUN server.”