as someone who bats for the other team, the combination of your faction’s hegemonic ubiquity and your more limited conceptions of heroism makes it really easy to read your literature from our perspective in order to gain spiritual insight and inspiration

for example Milton’s Lucifer in Paradise Lost taught me great lessons on what it means to stand up again when all seems lost

“Awake, arise or be forever fallen” ✊ 👆 👇

Anyway I hope this was helpful

thanks for your contributions to artless rhetoric

Sorry, here’s plainer language. Driverless cars are a public menace. People who hail them contribute to the acceptance of that public menace. As a reader, I do not find myself compelled to sympathy for your article’s protagonist. I stay away from places like California’s metro areas, because I do not want to participate in social experiments about me being run over by driverless vehicles.

I hope this has clarified my meaning for you and a lighthearted fuck you right back for posting this propaganda, you corpo-brained parrot.

boy if i had rights and benefits for every right and benefit Joe Biden “said he backed”

Some guys were annoying/sexist to her while she participated in a public menace and I guess this is supposed to mean something to me beyond “stay away from California”

No clue what you’re talking about at this point. I am talking about real tech that is currently deployed in middle America. I am not talking about pretend or fiction or MI-6 or whatever. Please.

Corporations are driven by people — they aren’t completely autonomous agents. Yet if you shot the CEO of Exxon or any of the others, what effect would it have? Another person of much the same ilk would swiftly move into place, much as stepping on a few ants hardly effects an anthill at all.

I’ve never understood why people feel compelled to share this take.

Edit, clarity: The quoted common rhetorical statement, not the overall essay’s conclusions about AI.

This is pretend.

Thanks for the actual input, people who haven’t worked around this kind of hardware are mostly limited to goofing around like it’s sci-fi when it’s mostly John Deere style nonsense

There aren’t short-range EMP burst emitters, that’s sci-fi pretend. These are real robot flashlight caddies they deploy at outdoor malls in Ohio.

Have you seen a teardown or something like that anywhere?

“One of the last frontiers of vehicle safety” If you’re going to post this sort of stuff where people can see it, maybe you could cover it with Content Warnings and Propaganda tags?

Pretty funny to posit that a LLM chatbot ought to talk us out of conspiratorial thinking while running on a corporate GPU farm absolutely BLASTING through electricity and copyright and IP violations because it’s legally convenient for the powerful. Please post more thought provoking unreasonable propaganda.

Wikipedia is fine, it isn’t “losing prominence.” This is willful misinterpretation of a speech to make it sound more dire, a nonsense AI propaganda angle, and a bunch of ageist nonsense about Gen-Z that will be immediately familiar to anyone who pays attention to this kind of slop.

Please post better articles

Ars Technica is a captured outlet. They consistently post dangerous corpo propaganda and little else.

😜 👢

The reason your someone might have thought this was a stupid question is because

• there is no evidence that AGI is imminent or even possible
• current tech labeled as AI is really limited in very boring ways, like LLMs

If some thing gets sold as an AGI, it will be a Mechanical Turk, As in, it will be a magic trick that actually uses human laborers like Amazon’s “AI Store” where you just walk out with your purchases. “If it works, it’s mechanical turks.”