That’s not what they’re asking for. They’re asking for the ability for it to not generate that sentence again.

Sure, but are you suggesting they somehow encoded, falsely, that they were a murder?

Because it’s very unlikely.

It fabricated this from no where. So there’s nothing to delete. Because it’s just a response to a prompt.

Your still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.

You cant even get it to count how many letter p are in the word apple. At least not last time I tried.

That storage your talking about isn’t facts. It’s how sentences are structured and what they “mean”.

As for the output “meaning” it’s still just guessing what you want to hear. No facts involved.

It’s not unreadable, it doesn’t exist.

The responses are just statistically what sounds vaugly what you want to hear.

They can erase the chat responses, but that won’t stop it from generating it again.

Generative AI doesn’t start with facts and work from there. It’s just statistically what you want to hear.

So the general tailscale actually uses peer to peer wiregaurd connections. Headscale is the middle point to negotiate these wiregaurd connections.

So none of the traffic moves through the VPS.

As for a VPS itself, it’s noore unsafe than your local bare metal. It’s still an application publicly exposed and needs basic precautions like fail2ban or crowdsec

It’s has its place for sure.

But the physics are far more against satalite.

But the reason I don’t believe in large scale satalite systems for consumers is because they’re disposable. They all fall down or contribute to the growing space junk problem.

So it’s not really any better at the end of the day than just burying a fibre cable for 40 years.

Because building space ports and rocket launches have 0 impact as well.

But you acknowledge this, so what’s your point? Why pay a techno billionaire when we can publicly fund cables way cheaper and more friendly?

If we can figure out how to put them on the bottom of the ocean and pipelines over just about any terrain, I think we can figure this out

I’m not saying your doing it intentionally.

Bur it is how it starts.

Edit the person I replied to didn’t use probably. Then you came in with a probably statement. That’s how miss information starts. People supporting bullshit with “probably”

A link to it will do

Do you? Because made up satistics are still made up.

This is how misinformation starts.

If your not sure, google it before commenting. For the sanity of the internet.

No GDPR does not require google to display app permissions like that…

Your just making things up.

Are they? What law?

I’m not saying legality is ethical.

I’m saying there’s no practical way to assemble that much material without exploration at some level.

Because they’re barely legal in certain places?

But how does it get more authentic without actual input if what’s accurate.

It’s not enough to tell and AI that’s somethings wrong. You have to also tell it what was right.

totally ethical thousands of photos of drawings of children in sexual contexts

Legality is just a technicality

Okay there bud.

But if it’s not accurate, will pedos jerk off to it?

Okay, and those drawings are my problem.

https://www.icenews.is/2010/07/28/unsavoury-cartoon-ruling-sparks-debate-in-sweden/

It’s not clear cut that those are okay.

But to know if it’s accurate, someone has to view and compare…