I know it’s been getting worse over time, but I could still find what I needed after some digging.

Recently it’s been like 10 minutes of adjusting search terms, still getting completely useless or irrelevant results, and me just giving up afterwards. Other search engines seem just as bad.

  • TerkErJerbs
    link
    fedilink
    1601 year ago

    *years? Yes. It used to be the bleeding edge of search and now it’s just profit driven enshittification like the rest of ai-ridden garbage tech wallstreet bullshit.

      • Zier
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        And don’t forget to check if your bread is baked by inserting your dick in it. You’re Welcome.

    • @Linnce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      The other day I asked google what season we were in. The AI got it wrong, and that’s like the simplest question ever.

    • @TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      It has definitely been getting worse over years, but I specifically meant the last couple of weeks. I could still find what I needed between all the garbage… now I can’t even find it after adjusting the search multiple times.

  • Zier
    link
    fedilink
    861 year ago

    If you use Firefox you can add a Search Engine that removes the google cruft.

    In about:config browser.urlbar.update2.engineAliasRefresh Boolean, hit the plus sign to add. Exit out of that screen. Then go to Search engines in Settings and “Add” [ whatever name you want to call it ] as a new search engine. And paste this URL and save it. https://www.google.com/search?q=%s&udm=14

    You will see that it deletes everything but search when you use it. You can also just use the url but you must replace the %s with your search term, like red+espresso. Example: https://www.google.com/search?q=red+espresso&udm=14

    I’m sure this works for other browsers, I just use Firefox.

      • projectmoon
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Returns the add custom search engine button. Which for some reason, has been hidden by default.

        • @Shortstack@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Oh my god, thank you for this. You solved a year long sufferfest for this internet stranger because of that greyed out button. Every god-damned guide online points you towards that button and I could not find the solution for it. What the fuck Mozilla

          • projectmoon
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            You can right click the URL bar for sites that support the OpenSearch XML standard. Which I guess is what they wanted to replace it with. But I don’t really know why they removed the button to a about: config setting. Could at least be a checkbox or something to enable.

    • @Andonyx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I have tried many times to do exactly what you said, and I still am not getting the option to add a custom search engine.

      Any advice you have is appreciated.

      • Zier
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        This is correct (your screen). Now go to your Firefox Settings, click on Search on the left side, scroll down to the Search Shortcuts section and below that box is a button labeled Add. You will get a box to add a search engine, the Alias field is optional. Make sure after you add it, there is a blue check in front of it on the list in the box or it’s invisible.

  • @TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    I was honestly getting so frustrated the other day at work when searching for something very specific and coming up empty handed. Tried DuckDuckGo and even fucking Bing and found what I needed in a matter of seconds. Google search is trash now. I have to go to the second page or further just to find something that isn’t an ad, AI response, or reddit. None of which are helpful.

  • Zerlyna
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The results are usually the most clicked, not necessarily the factual links. Others have recommended kagi. I haven’t tried it yet. I remember when the internet started and you had to use them all!

    • @TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I’ve used Kagi’s free trial. I’d turn to it when nothing else was helping and it did really well, but recently it hasn’t been helping either. It’s probably still fine for most things, but I’m often searching niche developer/programming things that are too burried under SEO/AI spam to find anymore.

      • @sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        FWIW, the default “programming” lens works quite well in Kagi, you can also create your own lens if you have a set of websites from which you routinely search info, and there are tons of bangs already (which can also be mapped to lenses BTW). In addition, you can downrank AI/SEO stuff when you find it (it is downranked by default in kagi), so that over time your results are quite clean.

      • Jeffool
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A string is just a collection of characters, in programmer speak. When you use quotation marks in your search to find exactly what you want. If your search was:

        dog “fast drive”

        Google used to show results that only had both the word “dog” and the joined phrase “fast drive” in the same result. Or tell you there were no results.

        Now it feels like Google uses that as a suggestion, giving you “dog” and any combination of “fast drive”, “fast driver”, “fast driving”, or whatever else Google thinks you want, instead of what you asked for. Or if they don’t find it, they serve you up whatever they want, with a small message about there being no matching results.

  • @gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    271 year ago

    I recommend Kagi, I’ve been using it for about six months now and results - especially small web results like blogs - are so much better. I also have a pretty good time image searching compared to when I was on Google.

    Yes it’s paid, but that to me is the price of resisting enshittification. Find a company that isn’t a publicly traded for-profit world-burner and pay them for their service. Is the idea of paying for email and search an alien concept to me? Yes. But I’m either paying Google whatever €120 a year in eyeballs on ads and an increasingly worse experience, or I’m paying €80 a year and getting a markedly better experience.

    Now it’s up to Kagi and Proton to not turn into shitty companies while other competitors catch up and we have a thriving ecosystem again.

    • @Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Kagi is amazing. I absolutely love its’ filtering features and I use that forums toggle all the time. It feels like such a more relevant experience for me. I tried it out with the 300 searches limit, but that wasn’t even close to enough, turns out I easily use 4 times that in a month and even though it’s not cheap it feels like it’s worth it.

    • @Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      I second kagi. Have been using it for almost a year now and I will stick with it. I switched from google to ddg some years ago to ddg before, but kagi is simply better.

      A colleague also uses it and is also very satisfied with it.

      • @gusgalarnyk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        I’ve read it, I read the discussion around it, idk man. One guy’s thoughts on a company and it’s founder isn’t enough to move me off of something without better proof, better alternatives, and worse crimes than maybe having a bad long term vision.

        Hopefully every company outgrows it’s founder and becomes a system. We’ll have to see, right now I’m satisfied and that gets me off Google and signals to others I’m willing to pay.

  • Subverb
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    Google makes money on ads. They make $300-$400 annually per user by displaying ads.

    They are motivated to tarpit you in order to show you more ads.

    Giving you your results quickly and efficiently costs them revenue.

    Use kagi, or another search engine.

    • @smackjack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I remember Google saying like 2 decades ago that it was actually their goal to get you off of their website as quickly as possible. If you clicked on a link, and then clicked back in less than 30 seconds, then Google would consider that search result to be not what you were looking for.

    • Is it sorta built similar to google? I keep switching search engines but Im SOOOOO used to google that its hard for me to adjust. I need something that kinda looks like google, but I can both Customize it more and just isnt google.

      • aHHH NAHHH i just tried it. It’s everything I want BUT THEY MAKE ME PAY TO SEARCH??! fuck no- I’m not about to fork over cash for a Subscriptions to USE THE INTERNET. Sounds really really nice but I’d much rather not. They aught to have it so you can pay for extra perks but paying JUST to search??? I’m good-

  • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    yes. use any of the following, in no particular order:

    • ecosia.org - A non-profit certified B corp that plants trees by serving ads in your search results. Bing search underneath.
    • duckduckgo.com - A privacy friendly search engine. Primarily sourced from Bing but mixes in a few other sources.
    • any SearXNG instance - A self-hostable search front-end to various search engines.
    • marginalia.nu - specifically ‘random’ - An independent DIY search engine that focuses on non-commercial content, and attempts to show you sites you perhaps weren’t aware of in favor of the sort of sites you probably already knew existed.
  • @tobyond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Google Maps is utter crap lately too. It seems to be making up locations, and several times in the past month, it’s taken me to the wrong place. It’s getting almost as bad as Apple Maps

    • @TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      My favorite one recently is constantly telling me to keep straight to remain on a highway like 7 times before I need to actually get off the highway. Glad I turned off the sound a long time ago otherwise I would have lost my fucking mind.

      • @shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        We have express (toll) lanes on some highways around me, and the navigation system loses its damn mind every time. “Keep going straight”, “continue going straight”, “proceed in a trajectory perpendicular to your current trajectory”; I fucking get it!

    • trainsaresexy
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      I went to a low data plan and learned that Google Maps consumes a vast amount of data (relative to my plan limit), and I download all my maps and had location off. 1 single bus route between two pinned locations was 30Mb. Maps and search could be so simple but they are insanely bloated.

    • QuarterSwede
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hey now, Apple Maps is more accurate, provides better directions where I am, has more up to date satellites imagery, and has been this way for years. I only use Google Maps to search because Yelp is god awful. I live in a rapidly expanding area and all of that matters.

    • @TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh god, yes this too. All the sponsored location spam drives me crazy. I love when I zoom in to a location and it doesn’t mark ANY of the shops besides STARBUCKStm

    • @tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Apple Maps is fantastic for navigation, but it doesn’t have enough locations on it. I use Gmaps for searching locations and apple for navigating.

  • SmokeyDope
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I used to a hater of Kagi but honestly its a damn good alternative search engine. They are doing some actual innovation and are very transparent. I still prefer a good searXNG instance but searxng is more for technical people who understand decentralized meta search instances. Here’s my simple guide on search engine alternatives to help you get away from google best you can.

    Google is finally collapsing under the weight of its own greed and lack of innovation. Now other companies are showing up to steal their lunch especial with the big monopoly case going on right now.

      • @angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Thank you both, Smokeydope and LucidNightmare. That was an interesting read! I gave SearXNG (paulgo.io) a try and it was a refreshing experience, I’m going to start using it regularly to see how well it does.

        • @LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Thank you for actually reading what was provided! SearXNG is pretty good, and I kinda want to give self hosting it a try! Good luck on the hunt!

        • SmokeyDope
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am glad to have helped you out! @angrystego I hope you enjoy searxng and it bcomes a useful tool in your life. Paulgo is an excellent first instance choice. It was my daily driver when I wrote up that guide and seems to still hold up well today.

          Now I use search.inetol.net and can recommend that as a good alternative in case paulgo isnt quite what you’re looking for or has too many timeout api errors. As always its a good idea to visit searx.space and try out some of the top instances with highest response time.

      • @sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        An article full of inaccuracies, but the most interesting bit is, all these conversations are possible because they clearly explain their views, which are publicly available on their website (for example, the philosophy behind the use of AI - which BTW is opt-in).

        How is that an example of being opaque is beyond me.

        • @LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          Might want to go through and click the hyperlinks. Otherwise, I got nothing else to tell ya homie. It’s all right there.

  • Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I stopped using it last year it got so bad, I ended up using DDG but that’s gotten shit and I’ve found myself back on Google. To me it feels 10% better than it was when I stopped.

    Although everyone’s experiences with Google are so different we’re probably all being A/B tested.

  • trashcan
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Yeah, last month I finally had enough and DDG has been alright

    • Skeezix
      link
      fedilink
      271 year ago

      The problem with DDG is if it doesn’t find results it just ignores your search terms and throws whatever shit it wants at you.

      • @Quik@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Oh my god, I feel this so much… Also, I think that recently got even worse, as I recently found myself switching between DDG/Google and finding both extremely bad for my query

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Yes!

          It think it got suddenly so much worse recently. Glad to see I’m not alone, something must’ve e changed.

        • @tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I know it’s being overly recommended in here, but kagi pretty much gives you exactly what you want. I’ve had very few times it’s been unable to give me my search in the first few results. Others swear by SearXNG

          • @Quik@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Yeah, I’ve recently switched to SearXNG instances on some devices, definitely seem to be getting better results

            • @Quik@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              apart from ne not having that much money laying around a the moment I’m not a fan of people having to pay for their search engine, as I’m of the opinion that such a fundamental tool to use the web should remain free

        • @starchylemming@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          does it also straight up ignore special commands like -whatever i could swear you could use that on many sites and it worked as "exclude this "

          • Skeezix
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I find that it often laughs at your excluded search terms and includes them anyway

        • trashcan
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          unless you switch on verbatim mode

          Which I’m just hearing about now. So clearly they don’t wnst us using it.

  • @aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    They fucked it all up with that AI bullshit awhile ago and it hasn’t recovered. I use start page now and am much happier.

  • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    It is half okay, but only if they are not getting paid to screw up your results. It is a coup against democracy where freedom of information is freedom of the press and is an entire fundamental pillar of democracy. Google’s entire business model has always been neo feudalism. A web crawler and search engine is like a library, it must be neutral, objective, and publicly funded as a non profit. Much the same with YT, it is our digital public commons and the most efficient form for information sharing in the primary form of human communication.